|
|
EMANCIPATION
|
ALIENATION
|
TRIALOGICAL BEZUG
|
5. DIALOGICS III - EINAI - PART III
6. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART I
7. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART II
8. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART III
9. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART IV
10.TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART V
OUR SCIENCE a n d PHILOSOPHY
A Simple Approximation
by Franz J. T. Lee
11th June, 2002
5. DIALOGICS III - EINAI - PART III
HOW TO LEARN TO ACT IN and OF OURSELVES
a n d TO THINK BY a n d FOR OURSELVES.
[N.B. WE CANNOT SHOW ALL THE ILLUSTRATIONS HERE, HOWEVER, AT THE END OF THIS INTRODUCTORY APPROXIMATION WE WILL SUPPLY YOU WITH ALL THE CORRESPONDING LINKS, TO STUDY EVERYTHING IN MORE DETAILS.]
HOW DOES EINAI EXIST?
Gegensatz, Counterposition, "Contradiction"
We counterpoise, gegensetzen :
Cosmos a n d Einai.
EINAI : Picking Up The Threads a n d Trails
REVISION
Why do some have severe difficulties to follow our expositions at this level a n d degree of scientific a n d philosophic reflections? The answer is very simple. Urgently all of us need thinking and thought exercises and training. Most of us are just used to either-or, -- either right or wrong, either agreement or disagreement, either good or bad -- passive, receptive, master-slave mental attitudes or mentalities. The moment that we have to relate, to inter-relate, more than two excluding, exclusive entities, the headaches begin. To remedy this fatal ontic situation, these brief approximations to acting a n d thinking AND excelling are written.
This part presupposes a very careful study of the previous sections. Now, let us scrutinize the major deliberations arrived at in the previous expositions and carefully expiscate the essential elements of the Gegensatz, to avoid any possible expostulations with reference to Einai, to Thought in general.
To arrive at our Gegensatz, at first, we explained its essential elements, Cosmos, and, Einai, and thereafter, we existentially counterposed or couterpoised our Gegensatz: Cosmos a n d Einai. Note: our dialogical Gegensatz is not identical to and does not exist as the dialectical Contradiction.
We also indicated, that in unilogics a n d dialogics, "Cosmos, and, a n d , Einai " are Sätze, are postulates, positions. Furthermore, we stated that "Cosmos a n d Einai" exists as a Gegensatz, contrapostulate, counterposition, "contradiction". It is worthwhile to recollect that Sätze concern Acts, and that the Gegensatz refers to Thought. Also, we should not forget that Sätze express Acts in Words or Language, which we speak, and with which we intercommunicate ourselves, with which we affirm our cosmic acts, our praxis.
A Satz has a Minimum Level, Cosmos, and this can be acted or expressed in zillions of ways, depending on the specific level on which we act, or on which we express ourselves in word and deed. Cosmos is the Minimum, is the Satz. The rest, for example, Essence, Object, Matter, Nature, Praxis or Deed, are all specific, not different, Cosmic Levels; the above are Words which express these minimal Acts, but they are also these very Acts themselves. Words and Language are not strange things out of this world, they are not heavenly, extra-cosmic things, they are simply just as cosmic as Acts themselves. Of course, we could study Sprachphilosophie, Philosophy of Language, but that won't alter their unilogical cosmic essence per se, won't even alter their dialogical natural a n d social non-relations a n d relations in res.
More, as noticed before, Einai naturally has Sätze: Cosmos, and, a n d, Einai. And Einai socially exists as a Gegensatz: as Cosmos a n d Einai.
Furthermore, the only way to relate non-related acts with related thoughts is to bring them into existence, is to interrelate them. In other words, we interrelate ( a n d ) our Sätze within our Gegensatz: (Cosmos, and,) a n d (Cosmos a n d Einai).
Obviously, even in Unilogics, as long as we stick to the relations, we could postulate any number of Sätze: Cosmos, and, a n d , Einai, AND, Nothing, etc. Similarly, in Dialogics, within the respective relations we could counterpostulate: Cosmos a n d Einai, Cosmos a n d Nothing, Einai a n d Nothing; also "and" a n d " a n d "; "and" a n d "AND", Level a n d Degree; Minimum a n d Maximum, etc.
Continuing with what was stated above, now, we arrive at the following Gegensätze:
Einai-in- a n d -for-itself;
Affirmation a n d Negation;
Level a n d Degree;
Minimum a n d Maximum;
Satz a n d Gegensatz;
Cosmos a n d Einai.
Before we advance to the majestic depths to analyse the following: Einai-For-Itself, that is, Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-Itself, in other words, Thinking-in-itself a n d Thought-for-itself, again, let us first make some general, pertinent, down-to-earth remarks.
Some Afterthoughts
Now, certain questions might pop up: Why all this "sophistry", this hair-splitting? Why all this brain-wrecking, this headache? We have already forewarned our thinkers that thinking is not a Sunday afternoon spree; it is not simple, it exists very complicated. And, Thinking has no relation to that what is generally known in the Patria as "having a brilliant idea", as participating in "cool talk", as "rabbling" with a Coke on the tongue, as swinging racist diatribes, as "Stammtisch-Gebrüll", as pub-guffaw, as gaffing and blabbing the whole day. These belong to ideological, raw straw; to the "cheap talk" of global pan et circenses.
Later, when we have completed the various sections, we will give simple and complex illustrations to demonstrate the precision of our expositions, their daily relevance, and their praxical essence a n d theoretical existence in dealing with everyday problems in the Patria; for example, with bombings, racism, fascism, terrorism and globalization.
Thus, before we embark on the tremendous task to elaborate the Gegensatz: "Einai-for-Itself", let us recollect some important aspects with which we have dealt until now.
"THE TEN COMMANDMENTS"
1. In previous parts we have illustrated our Method, which de facto is our Logical Method, is our very Multi-Logics. It does not operate in a "closed system", also not in an "open system"; it encompasses these and it includes more, i.e., it is neither a closed nor an open Logical Method. Until now, we have elaborated our Unilogics; furthermore, at present we are expounding our Dialogics; later, we will proceed with our Trialogics; and there are still much more to come.
2. We have illustrated our unilogical percepts, levels, unigories and Sätze, for example, Cosmos, "and", Essence, Rest, Nature and Praxis.
3. Also, we have elaborated our dialogical percepts, concepts, levels, degrees, diagories and "Gegensätze", for example, Einai, "a n d", Existence, Motion, Society and Theory.
Also, it has to be noted that a Diagory, Concept or Gegensatz is depicted as follows: Cosmos a n d Einai, Essence a n d Existence, Rest a n d Motion, Nature a n d Society, Praxis a n d Theory, Satz a n d Gegensatz, Level a n d Degree, "and" a n d "a n d", Unilogics a n d Dialogics. Thus, if we speak about "Einai", we always think "Cosmos a n d Einai"; if we discuss "Theory", we always analyse "Praxis a n d Theory". This is a typical example of how language or symbols cannot express thought with precision. In a certain way, we think various non-relations a n d relations "at the same time", not only parallel, but inter-related. This cannot be expressed in words or language.
4. Similarly, we have introduced our trialogical transcepts, mensions, Triagories and "Entgegensätze" , for example, Nothing, "AND", Transcendence, Bezug, History, Emancipy. Also, in this case, it is worthwhile to note that a Transcept is always excelled as a Triagory, for example,
as "Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing",
as "and" a n d "a n d " AND "AND",
as Essence a n d Existence AND Transcendence,
as Rest a n d Motion AND Bezug,
as Nature a n d Society AND History,
as Praxis a n d Theory AND Emancipy,
as Unity a n d Difference AND Trifference,
as Act a n d Thought AND Excel.
Note: in expressing our thoughts, we necessarily have to create some words ad hoc, and to fill them with our own logical contents; later they will be shaped more precisely and given scientific a n d philosophic stringency.
5. Also, we have underlined, that on a Level, Acting is Acting, that Thinking is Thinking, that Excelling is Excelling; but, on a Degree, that Thinking exists as Acting a n d Thinking; and, on a Mension, that Excelling surpasses (excels) as "Acting a n d Thinking AND Excelling". Later we will explain what is the modal Trifference between the Triagories:
"Acting a n d Thinking AND Excelling"
and
"Action a n d Thought AND Excellence".
6. We have emphasized that Acting is simple, that it has to be done like that, and that it must be expressed as such in words and language. We have stressed the necessity to understand that Thinking is complex, that Thought is an endeavour which implies immense mental difficulties, and that it has to be elucidated as such in words and language.
7. Again: We use Words and Language as Tools for Action, Thought and Excellence; but we have to develop more precise methods of expression and communication, of inter-relation. We have to create our very own, appropriate words, symbols, illustrations, cyphers and language.
8. We have deduced that Transcending surpasses on the apeironic frontiers of human imagination and daydreams; thus it excels in a foggy, opaque and vague manner, precisely as such it must be focused in words and language.
9. These explanations indicate that, logically, levels, degrees and mensions should not be mixed up: Neither in Act, nor in Thought, nor in Excel.
10. Finally, similarly, Sätze, Gegensätze and Entgegensätze, which correspond to Levels, Degrees and Mensions, and also to Acts, Thoughts and Excels, must not be expressed in Words and Language as if they were ingredients of a roly-poly, even if the proof of this pudding is really in the eating of it.
TOWARDS EXCELLENCE, TRIALOGICS, NOTHING
What follows now was acted, thought and transcended for over a decade, hence, we do not expect you to follow immediately. However, practice makes perfect, thus, take your time, eventually you will grasp the scientific a n d philosophic gist of all this. Until now, it follows that we have discussed, that we have thought Einai-in-itself, its Sätze, its Percepts; in a nut-shell, we expounded the Affirmation of Einai, i.e., Einai-itself.
STEP 5
As next philosophic step, we have to advance to analyse the following:
Einai-for-It-self, that is, Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-Itself.
Definitively, in the "Information Age", in the "Third Millennium", here we have to ask for super-concentration, for precise ultra-thinking and mega-thought! Based on all that we explained till now, kindly note the following:
Einai-in-itself has a non-relation to Einai-for-itself;
Einai-for-itself exists related to Einai-in-itself;
Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-itself, as Satz a n d Gegensatz, extensively, is non-related a n d exists related to Nothing; however, Nothing transcends, excels, superates neither Einai-in-itself nor Einai-for-itself.
THIS IS WRITTEN AS FOLLOWS:
Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing, or,
Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-itself AND Nothing.
Just remember, "Cosmos and Einai" is identified as Einai-in-itself, and, differentiated "Cosmos a n d Einai"exists as Einai-in- a n d -for-itself.
We are learning to act in, a n d to think for ourselves!
-----oOo-----
OUR SCIENCE a n d PHILOSOPHY
A Simple Approximation
by Franz J. T. Lee
12th June, 2002
6. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART I
HOW TO LEARN TO EXCEL OF, BY AND FOR OURSELVES
The Relation (Bezug)
TOWARDS NOTHING
We are moving on towards the most complicated, complex, vague and opaque parts of our New Science a n d Philosophy, but also towards the most interesting and undiscovered realms, where till now no noble philosophic eagles ever dared to fly, where the gaping abyss of Chaos and Nothing and where the Almighty God were blocking the entrances to poliversal knowledge and wisdom. And, as we said, opaque frontierlike knowledge should be depicted with vague wisdom, only as such with real marks(wo)manship we strike the "Pudelskern" (Dr. Faustus). Accompanying the Ancient Greek Wise Man, Bias of Priene, and also Gorgias, the Sophist, let's advance with our own, new, original authentic Science a n d Philosophy AND Wisdom.
You would recollect that in the previous part, we stated:
"As next philosophic step, we have to advance to analyse the following:
Einai-for-It-self, that is, Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-Itself." ... That is:
Its Non-Relations, Relations and Neithernor Bezüge to NOTHING, and vice versa.
"Hence:
Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing, or,
Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-itself AND Nothing."
However, in this section, we'll just present the fundamental elements, that are urgently necessary to embark safely, sane and sound, on our immense, philosophic, transhistoric express; thus, inexorably continuing our innovative voyage, towards the exotic, evergreen, unknown pastures of our third postulate, towards Nothing. However, refreshing our ontic memory, basically, let us recollect what we have already stipulated about our orgonic Relations, about our translogical Bezüge:
"Furthermore, concerning the Relation (Bezug), which becomes relevant in the next part, just some introductory remarks.
"The Percepts (not Concepts) which denote the Cosmos at rest, and which describe its intensive motion, its repose, its multiplicity, its poli-universality are methodologically identified as Unigories (not Categories), and they compound the essence of our Unilogical Method, our Unilogics. Cosmos perceives itself unigorically, unilogically; it is its own Self-Reflection, Selbst-Bezug, Non-Relation.
"The Bezug itself has levels (and), degrees ( a n d ), and mensions (AND).
"Also, we know a multiplicity of cosmic non-relations; however, we should note that non-relation denotes precisely what it is, a non-relation; there are all sorts of Relations: uni-relations, hemi-relations, semi-relations, multi-relations, non-relations, etc.
Also, it becomes obvious, that for us Science essentially pertains to Acts, Actions and Praxis, not to Work or Labour, although it includes them in its relations, as non-relations. Science is natural, is Natural Science, is Cosmic Science, is Cosmoscience. "
Now let us look at the illustrations at the top of this page.
The first illustration, above, shows the constituent postulates and the Bezüge of NOTHING, that is: [ Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing ] .
The third one shows all the primary Bezüge of our Trialogical Method, in fact, our Logical Method itself, also demonstrating the spheric Bezug of Nothing itself: [ "and" a n d "a n d " AND "AND" ].
Note, we are not landing in a "black hole"; on the contrary, we comfortably sail through a "white hole", seeing bright, orgonic, cuatrifferent light at the end of the black, alienating, universal tunnel, henceforth, navigating into other, other-other and another-other spheres.
"AND" is our trialogical Neithernor Method, that enables this trialogical, transcendental leap into Nothing, into Nowhere, Nowhen, Nohow, Nowhy, Nowhither, etc.; the preliminary, emancipatory, historic basics of all these, we will illustrate carefully step-by-step in the next section.
Meanwhile, we can just say that it is our logical process from Thought towards Excellence, and it crosses the current, formal-logical, dialectical, universal Rubicon as Emancipation, as History, as Nothing-itself.
However, let us arm ourselves with our invisible, invincible, invulnerable methodological tools.
In Unilogics, as Sätze, we elucidated the following:
Non-Relation, Relation, Bezug; in other words, we identified: and, a n d , AND.
As Gegensätze: they exist in:
Dialogics as: "and" a n d "a n d ";
Trialogics as: "and" a n d "a n d "; "and" a n d "AND";
"a n d " a n d "AND".
As Entgegensatz: it transcends in:
Trialogics as: "and" a n d "a n d" AND "AND".
Again, before we explain the Entgegensatz, in the next section, in the previous illustration look for yourself how this surpasses:
Triagories
In Unilogics, we analyse anything, using exclusively Unigories, Percepts, for example: Cosmos, Einai, Theory, Deed, Nothing, etc.
Our Logical Method uses the Non-Relation.
In Dialogics, that exists as Unilogics a n d Dialogics, we think exclusively within the realm of Diagories, that exist as Unigories a n d Diagories, in Concepts, that exist as Percepts a n d Concepts, for example, Cosmos, Einai, Theory, Deed, Nothing, Cosmos a n d Einai, Deed a n d Thought, Nature a n d Society, Praxis a n d Theory, etc.
In Trialogics, that excels as Unilogics a n d Dialogics AND Trialogics, we transcend with all the above, and more, with Triagories, that surpass as Unigories a n d Diagories AND Triagories, expressed in Percepts a n d Concepts AND Transcepts, as example:
Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing,
Deed a n d Thought AND Excel,
Nature a n d Society AND History,
Objectives a n d Subjectives AND Transjectives,
Beauty a n d Truth AND Love,
Affirmation a n d Negation AND Superation,
Minimum a n d Maximum AND Zillimum, etc.
So, don't forget, Nothing excels as neitherCosmosnorEinai; thus, as we will see, Excellence presupposes not a dialectical "Double Negation" but a trialogical "Triple Superation". As from now, we are acting, thinking and excelling -- a sane and healthy brain can accomplish all these without any cognitive difficulties, can non-relate, relate and neither non-relate nor relate as it pleases now. Fasten your seat-belts, we accelerate now, we excel in Trialogical Modus. And this has nothing to do with "doublethink", parallel-think or even with only thinking of any genre alone.
Till now, we were non-relating a n d relating; now neither non-relate nor relate will have its turn.
-----oOo-----
OUR SCIENCE a n d PHILOSOPHY
A Simple Approximation
by Franz J. T. Lee
13th June, 2002
7. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART II
HOW TO LEARN TO EXCEL OF, BY AND FOR OURSELVES
TRIALOGICS II
Difference AND Trifference
Preliminary Thoughts
Although, for sure, in the loony bin, the KKK McCarthy psychiatrist was very much interested in the Un-American mumbling of the patient Wilhelm Reich, but generally, as a result of the "either-or" formal-logical and the "good - bad", "right - false" ethical censorship, only certain, officially "correct", carefully selected and approved ideas enter "social consciousness", class consciousness, while others, "communist", "obsolete Marxist", "terrorist", "Arab" vistas land forever in the garbage of the Patria -- and then euphemistically this all is still called information, freedom of thought and expression, democratic education. This is the reason why billions, as far as social class consciousness is concerned still find themselves in the obscurantist "Dark Ages"; they would not even understand if one should explain to them their folly.
As a result of the even, uneven, combined and neither even nor uneven development of natural essence a n d social existence, some people in the metropolitan countries, at least, still had a "future", to reach contemporary American global fascism; others, perhaps a blessing in disguise, e.g., the Congo pygmies or the Kalahari Bathwa never ever will reach this Orwellian present; never ever will know what Labour and Capital are all about. This is also the very reason why so few would understand what we are saying here, and why so many would discard our Science a n d Philosophy as pure crap, as nonsense, as another variation of global madness. We are not saying this in a pejorative sense; we are not denigrating anybody, we are just explaining a horrible, horrifying patrian crime, home land mental genocide.
However, all these rambling, babbling and brawling of anybody and everybody enter into our Bias Bag, for a very simple reason, to be able scientifically a n d philosophically, with incision and precision, to negate anything that ever had been, has been, is and will be produced by Labour in History; to negate something really, you must know it inside-out, it must be your own; nonetheless, all these alsoinclude all the patrian, labour flashes, screams, sighs, daydreams and anticipations that ever were done, thought and excelled in Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing. This is also the reason why on all our Home Pages we freely published everything that anybody had to say about our topics and preoccupations.
The same special censorship treatment , the "democratic freedom of thought and expression", mentioned above, were given to Galileo Galilei, Francois Marie Voltaire, Denis Diderot, Ludwig Feuerbach, Karl Marx and others. At the eve of the 1830 revolutions, anonymously Feuerbach published his "Thoughts about Death and Immortality", attacking the official ideological view of the immortality of the individual soul, in other words, smashing the consolation pauper rest in peace prize of the opulent ruling classes that promised Tom, Dick and Harry that, at least after death they would live happily ever after in heaven. The German feudalist, absolutist STASI soon discovered the real author of this "satanic" work, and ever since, as a result of "Berufsverbot", Feuerbach had to survive from the crumbs that fell from the humble table of private lectureship.
Across patrian history, to postulate anything else than the Universe, was severely censured; note that Einai does not exist in our Universe of Cosmos; but that Cosmos exists in the "Diverse" of Einai; and that currently we excel towards the "Triverse" of Nothing, where neither Cosmos nor Einai exist, but excel, transcend themselves.
As from now, we will go very slowly, because the accelerated transvolution of our logical method is becoming very mysterious indeed; very easily we may go astray, may miss some very important intermediate transhistoric "places of rest". As stated before this may simply happen because we are now investigating, are navigating in an exotic, orgonic No Man's Land, in which -- in all probability, due to its vastness, vagueness and opacity -- none of us ever has been. Let us take a quick look at our oscillating speedometer, take a brief trialogical glance at our diagoric atlas, at Cosmos a n d Einai, or, Einai-in- a n d -for-itself.
As we have noted, what follows below is the illustration of the various manifestations of our dialogical method: of identification a n d differentiation, of affirmation a n d negation, of acting a n d thinking, of non-relating a n d relating.
1. Cosmos as Identity, as Satz, as Entity, as Unity, as Contrary/Opposite, as Act, as Non-Relation, as Cosmos-itself.
2. Einai as Identity, as Satz, as Entity, as Unity, as
Contrary/Opposite, as Act, as Non-Relation, as Einai-itself.
3. Cosmos is as Satz, just before becoming Thinking about
Cosmos, as Thinking about Thought-Things, before being related as a Non-Relation, being non-differentiated as Non-Difference, before becoming an Opposite, a potential Affirmation, taking on ontic form, as Einai-in-itself:
[ N.B. The illustration above is also a demonstration of being at the cross-roads (see the two illustrations below; there where they depart from each other) : of either taking the stony deviation towards Labour, towards Alienation, to the Patria, or of simply catching the transhistoric highway towards Emancipation.]
4. Finally, Einai exists as Satz a n d Gegensatz, as
Negation, as Affirmation a n d Negation, as Non-Relation a n d Relation, i.e., as [Thinking about Cosmos, as Thinking about Thought-Things] a n d as [Thinking about Einai, as Thinking about Thought-it-self], as Einai-in- a n d -for-it-self, i.e., as Einai-for-it-self.
The Trialogical Method
Dialogically, to explain the non-relations and relations of Cosmos a n d Einai is relatively simple, because we are dealing with just two opposite postulates. However, trialogically, we have to take very complex, trifferent steps:
1. Take with us, everything that until now we have non-related a n d related in our uni- a n d dialogics.
[Later we will call this History in the Patria.]
2. We also take with us, the perverted, alienated, patrian Labour; all its slave trade, colonial massacres, slave labour, atomic bombs, world wars, fascism, democracy, terrorism, holocausts, genocides and globalization.
[Later, we will call this Patria in History.]
3. Now, remember, previously in dialogics -- when we were postulating
Cosmos, Einai, Nothing --Einai existed as the direct opposite, as the Negation of Cosmos, also that Nothing, to excel trifferently from both of them, had to surpass as neither Cosmos nor Einai.
4. Hence, as Step 6, now logically follows -- not the Dialectical Double Negation, not the Negation of the Negation -- the Trialogical Triple Superation.
5. Summarized, here are the three steps; just remember, we are now in Trialogics, not in Unilogics a n d Dialogics, we have to "eliminate" progressively Green, Turquoise and Blue. Note, however, that in reality - although not "visible" - they are contained and do exist in the new colours; consequently, before we explain everything with precision in the next section, you yourselves should try to figure out what would follow now.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
OUR SCIENCE a n d PHILOSOPHY
A Simple Approximation
by Franz J. T. Lee
16th June, 2002
8. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART III
HOW TO LEARN TO EXCEL OF, BY AND FOR OURSELVES
TRIALOGICS III
Explanatory Intermezzo -- The Intellectual
Calm before the Brain Storm
LAUNCHING THE SPHINGID SECRETS OF NOTHING
Identity a n d Difference AND Trifference
Now, please relax and enjoy the following simple explanations about the logical application of our trialogical method to everyday reality.
Next time we will continue with our accustomed brain-storming again.
As stated before, we are applying our Trialogical Method, that includes our Unilogics a n d Dialogics AND Trialogics. That is, we are logically fully equipped to approximate or reveal, or even to explain any mystery, problem or miracle that concerns any known or still unknown level of action, degree of thinking and mension of excellence.
As far as minimal, cosmic thought-things and active, essential praxis are concerned, in the Patria, in the "Home Land" -- because they are in our Bias Bag -- we can, for example, identify any thing, event or non-relation towards rest in the Patria, by using scientifically the formal-logical method, especially its law of non--contradiction, A = A.
We could precisely identify Mr. Bush, and we would not confound him with any "-baby", "-man" or "-fire". We could read Marx's Capital, and identify "capital" on each page, and would not, by mistake, identify it with a "crime", or with "Kabul". We could incisively affirm labour within the systemic status quo and establishment, and surely, we would not mistake it with "pain", with "hard", with "day", with "party" or "ora".
Our patrian Formal Logics can perfectly accomplish all these acts and feats, by using the tools of words and language.
Furthermore, by simply using systemic, universal, absolute Dialectics -- all nicely packed into our Bias' Dialogics Cabin -- we could precisely differentiate between a Bush, a bush and a fire, then bind them together, in Mussolini "fascist" style, and illustrate the current, global, "bush-fire".
Similarly, by using the dialectical "law of unity and contradiction of opposites", we could study the "Entwicklungsgesetze des Kapitals" (Developmental Laws of Capital), for example, the "Global Concentration of Capital", the "Tendential Fall of the Rates of Profits", or the "Progressive, Global Proletarianization", identify and differentiate them, unite and contradict them, and then discover, what the oily, democratic "anti-terrorism" of the USA and NATO is all about, thus, revealing its capital crimes in Kabul, Afghanistan.
Furthermore, still using Formal Logics and Dialectics, we could relate the Roman Catholic, agro-feudalist slogan, Ora et Labora, with original accumulation of opulent wealth, of voracious Capital, then, combine it with colonial chattel slavery, husbandry and "wifedry" in agriculture and mining, with wage-slave labour and the labour pain of cannon fodder production for the crusades and world wars, with the innumerable cases of foreign policy massacres and neo-colonial genocide, and finally with the social-democratic ideals of the Labour Party in Britain, and show the brutal cynicism of trade unionist marches on Labour Day. In this way, we get the over-all picture, the very opposite of the infowar of any well-calculated, censored, disinformating broadcast or newsreel of CNN, BBC, UPI, REUTERS or DPA.
However, in addition to all these, by applying our Unilogics, we could identify the unilaterality, unimensionality and universality of the Patria, within History, as a perverted process of production, as a labour non-relation, which euphemistically is being called "History"; in reality, it is the Haven and Heaven of the creme de la creme of planet Earth, created by Great Gods, Great Men, with brilliant Great Ideas, belonging to a Great Race, Man, Great Racist Man, Mankind, homo sapiens sapiens alias homo homini lupus, residing in the Great Metropolitan North.
With our Dialogics, we could fathom these differentiations illustrated above; we could interrelate scientifically a n d philosophically Natural Science a n d Social Philosophy, Human Essence (Being) a n d Human Existence, Nature a n d Society, Human Praxis a n d Social Theory, US Economics a n d Global Politics, Corporate Globalization a n d Political Terrorism, Physical Labour a n d Intellectual Labour, etc.
In fact, we could interrelate all these, and arrive at a definite scientific a n d philosophic approximation of the current global state of affairs. If anybody with openmindedness, humility and cautiousness should read our chats and publications with the academic care that they merit, then, s(he) would notice, would begin to understand what has just been stipulated above. Of course, a conditio sine qua non is the militant, optimistic atmosphere of studere, the emancipatory profession of a student, and this implies objectively a n d subjectively, dialogically: sine ira et studio e t cum ira et studio -- the very opposite of what education, the schools and universities, the alma mater, have taught us until now.
In our Dialogics, the identification of what is "good" or "bad", "true" or "false", "right" or "wrong" is retained, and we know the connotations of these mental chains; but we can very well differentiate between "good" and "bad", between a "non-good" and a "no good""; also, we know what is "good a n d no-good" or "good a n d bad"; we can identify both "terrorism" and "anti-terrorism" as terrorism-in-itself. Unaffected by ideology, disinformation and infowarfare, we can easily inter-relate, can differentiate the bombing of the Twin Towers a n d the bombing of Afghanistan, and know what is bombing, and how it exists, what a n d who bombs why a n d how in the New World Order, in Globalization. Studying our chats and debates, you will see how easily we have identified and differentiated this age-old Bush - Bin Laden fait accompli.
Furthermore, applying Trialogics, the dust of the programmed macabre scenario did not subside as yet, when we already told you the names of the culprits involved; anybody with a sane and sound mind that knows anything about aero-planes, pilots, automatic pilots, landings, remote control, Manchurian candidates, Mkultra, sleepers, human bombs, soldiers, wars, oil, new energy, global recession, world depression, Florida elections, corporate America, space travel and colonization, labour, production, creation, about Watergate, Angolagate, Bushgate, about the CIA and FBI could figure this one out very easily; yet today still billions, including the true American patriots, fall for the United States Government's sinister fairy tale, for Bush's brilliant, war-mongering, transatlantic faites vos jeux.
To arrive at the bottom-line of this Janus-faced capital crime, to untie the Gordian Knot of the contemporary global, fascist "reign of terror", one has to apply the transcendental Relations, Bezüge, of the Trialogical Triple Superation. Formal Logics, Dialectics, Universal Logics, Labour and Production have reached the maltreated natural limits of their very own perverted social demarcations, of the mode of capitalist, industrial, technological production. They themselves have become obsolete, are facing extinction, are fading into oblivion. And, surely, not into Nothing, or into the arms of the Heavenly Father, of God. Homo homini lupus is not as stupid as all that to believe in his own religious or nihilist fantasies, that he himself -- from China, India and Japan to Ancient Greece, the Mideast and Egypt, from Europe to Africa and America, from Australia to Polynesia -- has disseminated across the globe, and which have been ideologically perfect for the immense accumulation of wealth, profits and power.
We are leaving the geocentric and heliocentric Weltanschauungen, straight in front of our limited productive vision is already looming the unlimited, transgalactic highway of Creation, and for that we do not necessarily need Los Alamos, the MIT or NASA. For a creative "beginning" out of Nothing, as was prophesied, we just need the Word, Thinking and Thought: Einai-in- a n d -for-itself.
----------oOo----------
OUR SCIENCE a n d PHILOSOPHY
A Simple Approximation
9. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART IV
A CONCISE EPIGENESIS AND PRECISE EPILOGUE
Drawing the Trialogical, Necessary, Patrian Conclusions
By Franz J. T. Lee
June 28, 2002.
As usual, I will try to delineate simple things on their simplified levels, elaborate complex things on complicated degrees, and paint vague, transhistoric, dawning processes on their very own opaque, mensional canvas.
If we consider the billions of human prayers, disseminated across all earthly longitudes and latitudes across the last 20 millennia, hopes, anticipations and daydreams that flooded and drowned the agonizing face of Mother Earth, that moaned and waned in the perennial labour typhoons of the four windy global tycoons, that groaned and ground the very foundations of the seven continents, whose accompanying fearing tears, sometimes even crocodile sighs, have filled the seven seas, that still today thunder, echoing themselves far yonder in the mysterious galactic clouds of Magellan, then we could measure, could understand the scanty, meagre fruits of these meditational, transmeditational, transcendental, yet sincere, innocent, human endeavours, then, and only then, we could measure the magnitude of all human misery, poverty, hunger, sorrow, ignorance and despair, the "sigh of the oppressed creature", then, from a global angle, we could and would grasp the immense magnitude, the magnanimity of the capital, cardinal crimes of the respective ruling classes across the ages, of our wonderful education and socialization, of heartless manipulation, endless indoctrination and of the resultant horrible, horrifying, mental holocaust that currently is scorching and scourging billions of planetary human essences out of galactic existence.
Beyond doubt, there are lucky exceptions, but what about the following victims of human labour, "behaviour", brutality and bestiality? Sodom and Gomorra, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Twin Towers and Pentagon, Sharpeville and Jerusalem, Iraq and Afghanistan, cannibalism and savagery, barbarism and slavery, wars, wars, more wars, opium wars, wars of the roses, crusades, thousand years' wars, world wars, new wars, feudalism, witch-hunting, colonialism, imperialism, apartheid, socialism, communism, liberalism, neo-liberalism, fascism, nazism, holocaust, genocide, neo-colonialism, globalization, etc., etc.?
Holding hands, these godforlorn creatures would probably reach the moon; what happened to their prayers, their liberty, equality, fraternity, democracy, rights and salvation? Please answer, homo homini lupus! Tell us, noble savage! Explain to us the transhistoric value of passive, silent prayers, the emancipatory value of pacifism, Gandhism, universal education, the infinite justice of democratic socialization. We respect the scientific and philosophic endeavours, the great ideas, especially of the great men, of great races, the hard work of all priests, teachers, educators, pedagogues, professors, lawyers and judges, but we do not admire, do not glorify, do not hail them.
Work, Labour, Technology, stone axe, bow and arrow, fire, salt, culture, civilization, geocentricism, christianization, renaissance, reformation, heliocentricism, revolution, production, computer, cloning, genetic engineering, nano-technology, robots, hardware, software, chips, globalization, creation,.... Quo vadis? Whither goest thou, homo faber, l'homme machine, god-man, man-god? Did it all work, does it work, and for whom? Why does it not work anymore? Why are all its works gone? Why are accumulation choking, the profits dropping, the concentration and centralization reaching breaking, resting point levels, approximating their final world peace, their formal-logical, dialectical, absolute universality? Who still sees, sees anything still? Who sees this? This sees whom still?
We honour all the Great Gods and Saints, Nkulunkulu, Gaia, Osiris, Isis, Tixo, Vitzliputzli, Jahwe, Buddha, Allah, Jesus Christ, Peter, Mohammed, the Pope, etc., but we do not believe in them, do not adore them; we know them, we think about them, we think of them. We have no problems with them, with the gods, we respect all divinities; all of them have no problems with us; probably, they created us, left us in peace, and as Epicurus already knew, they forgot all about the crown of their creation, about us. Whether we will ever see our creators face to face, that's all written in the Clouds of Magellan, that's what we'll investigate, will try to study in our Trialogics. We do not do anything great, we are not great, do not want to be great, do not feel great.
Greatness, magnanimity, aristocracy, nobility and glory brought us to where we are now, to global obscurantism, to myopic mediocracy, to blind mediocrity, to corrupt kleptocracy, to decaying democracy.
We are reading the Bible, Koran, Talmud, etc., but we do not convert them into "holy" mental chains; we study the great works of Plato, Aristotle, Maquiavelli, Hobbes, De Gobineau, Clausewitz, Hitler, but we do not use them as guide-lines for our glorious modus vivendi et operandi. We are acquainted with Ptolemy, the Vedas, Euclid, Ibn Khaldun, Avicenna, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Einstein, etc., we learn from them, we have an extraordinary respect for their scientific wealth of knowledge, but they do not overshadow us with their gigantic works. We are touched, bewitched, enthralled by the philosophic thoughts and theories of all Wise Men, from Thales to Plato, to St. Augustine, to Kant, to Hegel, to Bourdieu, Rand, Chomsky, to Adorno, Horkheiner, Habermas and Bloch, but we do not forget to act, think and excel, of, by and for ourselves. We are bewildered, flabbergasted, enchanted by all revolutionaries, from Spartacus to Thomas Münzer, to Babeuf, to Marx, to Engels, to Lenin, to Trotsky, to Rosa Luxemburg, to Ulrike Meinhof, to Lumumba, Jose Marti, Bolivar, to Mao, to Ho Chi Minh, to Allende, to Castro, to Che, to Rodney, etc., etc., but we do not copy them in a follow-my-leader style, do not enshrine them, idealize, idolize, idolatrize, ideologize them; we do not bow before them in shame, do not let them disembark on our backs, do not kiss their hands and feet, do not salute them with cannon salvos and in a master-slave attitude, we do not genuflect in front of their omnipotent, divine hegemony.
Summa summarum, nothing human is strange to us; is strange to our Science a n d Philosophy, to our Trialogics, and with due self-respect and constructive auto-critique, all human endeavours, including patrian acts and actions, malpractices, corrupt business, capitalist greed, war crimes and perverted vices, are included in our Science a n d Philosophy AND Emancipation. To negate them, we firstly have to affirm them, own them, make them our own, grasp and understand them, and then only we could neither affirm nor negate them, that is, place them in front of historic, emancipatory judgement and justice.
We are conscious of the expansion, of the limits, of the probabilities and possibilities of the endemic, pathological, intra-systemic realities and perverted non-relations of terrorist globalization, of the bloody horizon of patrian labour and creation, of its property, intellect, intellectual property and intellectual property copyrights. We do not know everything, that would be tantamount to mental stagnation, to ontic ossification, but we know much, are learning much, and wish to know much, much more.
Having said all these, with these logical conclusions we can now mount, surmount our Trialogical Pegasus, galloping up the Unknown Paramount, towards the lonesome, lonely, undiscovered Cliffs of Nothing.
----------oOo---------
|
|
|
|
|
 |
